There's so much gossip and so little time -- here's a quick recap of this weekend's highlights.It seems as though Kelly Clarkson is trying to shake her "good girl" image. Not only has she has changed her hair, her clothing style and her musical style, but she's also decided to go naked. Yes, that's right -- the Grammy-winning singer told US Weekly that she loves to walk around her house in the buff no matter who's around.
Which brings us to Hannah Montana (aka Miley Cyrus) who seems to regret a recent Vanity Fair photo shoot. The Disney star posed for some "artistic" photos but was extremely embarrassed once the story and pictures were published. The images have attracted controversy because of Miley Cyrus' age and the fact that she is regarded as a role model for young girls.
Kenny Chesney hurt his foot at his South Carolina concert while a bomb scare delayed the Bon Jovi concert in Florida. Looking at sports highlights -- the NFL draft has ended, NASCAR had a multi-car crash at Talladega and WWE Raw is live from East Rutherford, N.J. tonight on USA Network.
Well, there you have it. Do you know of any other weekend highlights that didn't show up in our hot searches? If so please tell us about them.
Hot Searches From April 28, 2008
1. NFL Draft -- Check out who was drafted this weekend
2. NASCAR -- Multi-car crash brought out the caution flag
3. WWE -- Catch tonight's WWE Raw live
4. 'Big Brother 9' -- Catch a recap and find out who won
5. Kelly Clarkson -- Likes to walk around naked?
6. American Airlines -- Announces changes to checked bag policy
7. Kenny Chesney -- Sustains injury during South Carolina concert
8. Food Network -- Alton Brown was in Jackson for book signing
9. Hannah Montana -- Disney star upset over Vanity Fair pictures
10. Bon Jovi -- Bomb scare delays concert?
More Sponsored Links For: tv shows online, tv series dvd, tv show tickets





Reader Comments (Page 5 of 11)
81. What a bunch of perv dimrods. She didn't pose nude. She was fully clothed. If you **** wern't so brain dead and polluted of the soul you could have looked at the pictures.
Posted at 10:29PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Dave
82. What a bunch of inbred dibbits. She didn't pose topless just bare sholdered. If you pervs would have bothered you could have looked at the pictures of the shoot.
Posted at 10:31PM on Apr 28th 2008 by dave
83. The Picture is Stunning!!Everyone should be so lucky to have Annie photograph them.It's beautiful art.
Posted at 10:33PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Angela
84. This Cyrus bimbo is an idiot.
Posted at 10:34PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Jerome
85. Well im 13 and i love miley cyrus. she is my idol. i wish i had her as a friend. who cares if she takes pictures, she wasnt even naked. its her life and she could do what she wants with it. some people think she is so bad for taking pics. well i dont think so. she is just a person and all people make mistakes. rock on miley -Ashlee, CA
Posted at 10:36PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Ashlee Sanchez
86. you can tell she isnt naked,you can see her white shirt.and there is a problem with nuditey,because know one else wants to see you'r body!so keep it covered!
Posted at 10:37PM on Apr 28th 2008 by sabrina
87. I really dont see anything wrong with her being naked look at the world you go around naked in public and a young girl shouldn't be open your eyes whats good for one is good for the other even if it is your daughter.
Posted at 10:41PM on Apr 28th 2008 by charles taulbee
88. well im 13 and i love miley. she is my idol. some people think she is bad for taking pictures, well i dont get why they think that. miley is just a human like all the rest of us. and all humans make mistakes. i feel bad for her because everyone makes a big deal out of nothing. rock on miley your still my inspiration -Ashlee, CA
Posted at 10:42PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Ashlee Sanchez
89. First and foremost, will those who feel the need to open their mouths and allow such verbal diarrhea spew out about how Miley should feel ashamed about doing the VF pics please read the ENTIRE story? Number one, she wasn't naked, even VF admitted to that. They just posed her in such a way that it APPEARED to be so, whether she realized that it was the intent or not. If she DID, then yes, she should feel ashamed. If not, she should feel at the least mortified that she was taken advantage of in that manner. Now, as for the other "leaked" pics, can anyone honestly tell Me that they never, EVER, did something even remotely similar when they were her age? You may not have taken pictures, but I guarantee each and every single person who reads this has had similar experiences in their teens. And, if you think that YOUR teens are not, or will not, do the same, you need your head examined. After all, you can't control or watch over your child 24/7. You can only hope they make good decisions in those situations. The only bad decision she made was take pictures and left them vulnerable to be shown over the 'Net. Hell, if she were the first 15 year old to take slutty pics of herself, then I could understand the outrage. But, damn, do a "Safe Search Off" search on Google and I guarantee you can find thousands of similar pics from other girls.
Posted at 10:42PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Master Diablo
90. Give it up! I haven't seen the pictures but the article clearly states that she was not naked! Leave the kid alone.
Posted at 10:43PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Lily
91. I cannot understand what the big deal is. She is showing less skin than she would while wearing a bikini at the beach. Ann Libowitz is a respected ARTIST and to my knowledge has never done anything terrible, let alone anything to merit this. So my question is, exactly who has a mind so perverse, so base, so low, as to start any kind of gossip about these two respected women to make themselves a buck? Again, all they showed is the girl's face and bare back, less than she would be showing on the beach, so then it becomes more of what a perverse mind can read into it, rather than what it is. And we all know how fair the media can be when it comes to sensationalism now, dont we?
Posted at 10:45PM on Apr 28th 2008 by takitheartist
92. Wouldn't a normal person get arrested for taking a photo of what appears to be a nude 15 year old? This photographer should be ashamed.
Posted at 10:47PM on Apr 28th 2008 by frankie
93. no way...? uh.. hey Miley, its ok to be naked but u really dont HAVE TO show it off, keep it to yourself & stay outta troubles.
BE YOURSELF.
Posted at 10:47PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Lexyxo
94. I adore Miley and so does my 6 year old daughter Kayli. She was shocked when she found out about this. She asked "why?" and I told her that Miley made a mistake and she wasn't naked, it only made it appear that way. She said she still loves her and she hopes she never does it again. All of the people that are waiting on her to mess up, are really having a field day with this one. I would never dare put her in the same catagory as the "spear sisters". She comes from a loving family, that cares for her. And I don't see pictures of her mother and father out partying with her. Miley you are in our prayers. We love you. Belinda and Kayli.
Posted at 10:52PM on Apr 28th 2008 by BeLinda
95. This is crazy. What's more revealing? Miley with a bare back or Miley laying all over her daddy in all sorts of positions? Can you say trailer park family inbred love? SICK!!!!!!!
Posted at 10:58PM on Apr 28th 2008 by kelly
96. This was Kiddie Porn, If Hustler printed this Larry Flint would face life. Vanity Fair? Why was this
sexual layout needed for a child? Oh yes, They are Liberals, raid a LDS compound one week and cheer at Kiddie porn the next. I find both things equal in the amount of slime the human race is skimming through.
Posted at 11:01PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Stan
97. This is absolutely ridiculious. There is nothing wrong with the Vanity Fair photos. They're beautiful and artistic, not sexy or slutty. They were very tastefully done. And with most of todays teen stars, Miley deserves some respect. The poor girl has done nothing wrong and should have no reason to be embarassed because of these photos. They're pieces of art, and for some reason the media and some of you people are too ignorant to realize and appreciate it. Barley any of her skin is reveled anyways. It's just ridiculious. Get over it people, seriously, and leave the poor girl alone. At least she's not pregenant [Jamie] or has naked photos floating around [Vanessa]. She's a good role model and has done nothing to hurt her clean Disney image, yet anyways. the media just wants SOMETHING to talk about and make her look bad.
Posted at 11:03PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Alyssa
98. Maybe if she were receiving a proper education, Miley would have learned better judgement skills to make career decisions. Miss " I am not really a school girl but play one on TV" is a role model for millions of young girls. She has set the poor example that making money by selling sex appeal is what being a good all american girl is all about. Shame on her parents for pimping their own daughter like this. With Madonna it was her own rebellious choice to go slutty.
Posted at 11:03PM on Apr 28th 2008 by don
99. Miley cannot sing but if she was really dressed that what's wrong with taking the picture. I think that even though Miley didn't earn her fame and contracts should have been revised more thouroghly, it is not entirely her fault what happened with the pictures.
Posted at 11:08PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Jackie
100. Miley has nothing to be ashamed of over the pictures taken. How wonderful that she has the opportunities to have a phontographer like Annie to take the pictures!
The shame belongs to the beholder that turns this innocence into anything more than it is.
Posted at 11:09PM on Apr 28th 2008 by Deb